Ethical Considerations in Settling a Class Action Update

(672 Ratings)

Produced on: March 23, 2017

Course Format On Demand Audio

Taught by

Categories:

Course Description

Time 60 minutes
Difficulty Intermediate

Many class actions settle, and both plaintiffs’ and defense attorneys face many types of ethical issues as they settle class actions. For example, should a defendant company make an offer of judgment to a representative plaintiff to rid itself of a case? When settling a case, is a cy pres award appropriate for unclaimed funds? How do attorneys’ fees factor into settlement negotiations?

In this ethics program, led by attorneys Deborah Renner and Kimberly Kalmanson, we explore ethical issues from both sides of the “v.”

Learning Objectives: 

  1. Understand offers of judgment as a means of settlement in light of recent U.S. Supreme Court cases

  2. Identify ethical considerations involved in pre-certification communications with putative class members regarding settlement

  3. Recognize when and how, from an ethical perspective, negotiations regarding attorneys’ fees factor into overall settlement discussions

  4. Discuss the ethical considerations involved in creating incentive awards for class representatives

  5. Gain familiarity with the cy pres doctrine and the ethical considerations counsel must take into account in structuring a cy pres distribution

Faculty

Deborah Renner

BakerHostetler

Deborah Renner focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation, including the defense of consumer fraud, data breach, ERISA, and securities class actions. Deborah has successfully defended numerous companies in nationwide, multidistrict and state class actions. She has defeated class certification in courts around the country and has won the dismissal of class claims at the outset of numerous actions. Deborah frequently advises companies on class action defense and regulatory inquiries. Among her areas of knowledge and experience, Deborah is certified in information privacy.

 

Deborah leads BakerHostetler's class action practice in New York and is a founder and former editor of BakerHostetler's Class Action Lawsuit Defense blog. She also serves as the Pro Bono Coordinator for the New York office, and is on the firm's Diversity Committee.

 

Experience

  • Won complete dismissal of data breach class action. Polanco v. Omnicell, Inc., 2013 WL 6823265 (D.N.J. Dec. 26, 2013).
  • Represented amicus on winning side in seminal class action cases in U.S. Supreme Court. Standard Fire v. Knowles, 133 S. Ct. 1345 (2013);Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 133 S. Ct. 1426 (2013).
  • Represents broker-dealer in securities class action.
  • Represents company in Civil Investigative Demand by state attorney general regarding data privacy and security practices.
  • Won summary judgment in a putative class action concerning alleged fraud in the pricing of long-term care insurance. Rakes v. Life Investors Ins. Co. of America, 2008 WL 2158717 (N.D. Iowa June 20, 2008), aff'd, 2009 WL 2981976 (8th Cir. Sept. 18, 2009).
  • Won the complete dismissal of a securities fraud class action alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Medis Investor Group v. Medis Technologies, Ltd., 586 F.Supp.2d 136 (S.D.N.Y. 2008), aff'd, 2009 WL 2171277 (2d Cir. July 21, 2009).
  • Since 2009, as a lead attorney on the BakerHostetler team that serves as counsel to Irving H. Picard, SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Deborah managed a team of attorneys in Picard v. JPMorgan Chase, which resolved in two settlements totaling $543 million for the SIPA Trustee and class action plaintiffs and which led to a $1.7 billion forfeiture to the United States Attorney's Office. In addition, Deborah has focused her efforts on enforcing the U.S. Bankruptcy Court's automatic stay and otherwise seeking injunctions to stop class actions and other cases from proceeding. Deborah's reported decisions include: 
    • Picard v. Fox, 429 B.R. 423 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010), aff'd, In re Madoff, 848 F.Supp.2d 469 (S.D.N.Y. 2012), aff'd, 740 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2014).
    • Picard v. Stahl, 443 B.R. 295 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011), aff'd, In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, 2011 WL 7981599 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2011), aff'd, The Lautenberg Found. v. Picard, 512 Fed.Appx. 18 (2d Cir. 2013).
    • Picard v. Maxam Absolute Return Fund, L.P., 460 B.R. 106 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011), aff'd, 474 B.R. 76 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).
    • In re Bernard L. Madoff, 477 B.R. 351 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012), aff'd, 2013 WL 551027 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30. 2013).

     

    Recognition

    • New York Metro "Super Lawyer"

     

    Memberships

    • American Bar Association, Section of Litigation Class Action and Derivative Suits 
    • International Association of Privacy Professionals 
    • Certified Information Privacy Professional (U.S.)
    • Defense Research Institute, Appellate Advocacy Section

     

    Pro Bono

    • Deborah frequently works with Immigration Equality, helping gay, lesbian, transgendered and HIV positive individuals gain asylum in the United States.
    • She works closely with the Brooklyn Bar Association's Volunteer Lawyers Association, and has served on its Advisory Board.

    Services

    • Appellate and Major Motions
    • Class Action Defense
    • Complex Commercial Litigation

    Prior Positions

    • Fordham University Law School: Adjunct Assistant Professor of Class Action Law (2002 to 2006)

    Admissions

    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    • U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York
    • New York
    • District of Columbia [Inactive]

    Education

    • J.D., Harvard Law School, 1992, cum laude
    • M.A., Princeton University, 1987
    • B.A., The Johns Hopkins University, 1984, with honors

     

Kimberly Kalmanson

Kalmanson Law Office, PLLC

Kimberly Kalmanson is an attorney with a private practice in New York City. Concentrating her practice on business and commercial litigation and transactions, Ms. Kalmanson represents a variety of clients in commercial lawsuits, primarily involving contract, securities, and fraud disputes in both federal and state court, as well as before FINRA and the American Arbitration Association.  

 

Prior to establishing a solo practice, Ms. Kalmanson prosecuted and managed complex securities fraud cases against national and international companies and banking institutions on behalf of institutional investors at Labaton Sucharow LLP. There, Ms. Kalmanson’s primary focus was on residential mortgage-backed securities and the subprime mortgage lending and securitization industries. In addition, Ms. Kalmanson was primarily responsible for, and coordinated and managed multiple bankruptcy claims in a high profile federal bankruptcy. Before joining Labaton Sucharow, Ms. Kalmanson was an associate at Dentons US LLP (formerly, Sonnenschein, Nath and Rosenthal LLP and SNR Denton US LLP) where her practice focused on complex civil litigation, as well as white collar criminal and government investigations work. At Dentons, Ms. Kalmanson represented banks, institutional lenders and insurance companies in a variety of suits arising out of defaulted and distressed assets. Ms. Kalmanson has represented a variety of clients in breach of contract and fraud actions. One notable matter involved obtaining a $76 million summary judgment award on behalf of a European banking group in a suit in in New York federal court against loan guarantors, a judgment that was affirmed on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In addition, Ms. Kalmanson represented an insurance carrier in a suit to adjudicate the obligations of a financial institution managing a reference pool of assets underlying a series of credit swap transactions. Ms. Kalmanson has also represented a variety of institutions and individuals in government and internal investigations.

Reviews

WD
William D.

Solid course; very informative.

MG
Michael G.

Overall good

KF
Kenneth F.

This is an important topic. Thank you for taking the time to address it in this course.

SE
Silver E.

thank you.

RD
Raymond D.

Great presentation. Documents were also very good.

GC
Gerald C.

Thanks

DL
Dorothy L.

Great program!

RM
Rondal M.

The presenters did a great job of trying to portray low damage class actions as being compatible with the concept of ethical practice of the law.

DD
Dave D.

Complex stuff

AN
Andrea N.

one of the best on line courses I've taken

TL
Trudi L.

Very well done

EP
Eric P.

Could use more on ethical pitfalls to avoid and or best practices.

ES
Elizabeth S.

Very informative.

CE
Corey E.

Thank you

SE
Stephen E.

Excellent slides...which can be used later.

JM
James M.

very thorough, and they presented the material well

KR
Kenneth R.

Great program. Fabulous presenters and lots of information in an easy to follow informative presentation.

JA
Joy A.

great presentation

AR
Amanda R.

Liked the two-person panel.

TP
Timothy P.

I found it very informative.

KS
Kory S.

This is an excellent presentation, an exemplary model for how to weave together ethical and substantive issues.

Load More

$59

$ 59 Ethics and Class Actions In Stock

Accreditation

Get Unlimited Access to Lawline Courses

Unlimited CLE Subscription gives you access to take almost any course from our catalog and earn as much CLE credit as you need.