This course is no longer available for credit on our site. Explore our online catalog to view more courses
On Demand
Unlimited

Thicke v. Gaye: Musical Copyright Infringement

1h 1m

Created on November 22, 2013

Intermediate

Overview

"Blurred Lines," The Robin Thicke song known as much for its controversial video as its catchy beat, has sparked a tussle between the Pharrel/Thicke camp and the Marvin Gaye estate. At the heart of the issue stands the question, "did Robin Thicke infringe upon Marvin Gaye's estate's copyright by producing a song that may or may not be too similar in sound, beat, lyric and general presentation?

 

In this course, Music law attorney and returning Lawline Faculty Member, Steven Gordon will join Copyright Law Scholar, Bob Clarida to discuss the underlying, determinative legal questions in music copyright infringement cases, addressing the standards used to determine 'song infringement', and the procedures that representing attorneys must prepare for in efforts to secure or liberate their clients' rights.

We know, "Blurred Lines" was all over the radio this summer. Lawline invites you to join us and these two fine attorneys as we explore the music from a different angle, set on defining what constitutes copyright infringement in the music industry.

Learning Objectives:

I.    Answer, "what constitutes music copyright infringement?"

II.   Trace the procedure from initial suit, to declaratory judgment, to summary judgment and beyond

III.  Comprehend at what stage music copyright infringement cases are most prone to settlement

IV.  Identify protectable vs. non-protectable song elements

V.   Determine which parties, in a music infringement, have standing to complain and/or answer

Gain access to this course, plus unlimited access to 2000+ courses, with an Unlimited Subscription.

Explore Lawline Subscriptions