In recent years, the US Copyright Office has issued refusals based on a lack of originality. The refusals follow common themes. The design elements are not sufficiently original and creative. Purely functional features cannot be copyrighted. Elements that are common, familiar, or standardized cannot be copyrighted. And lastly, “we could not find any individual pictorial, graphic, or sculptural element, nor a combination of such elements, that could justify copyright and registration. Our determination is that the work does not satisfy the originality and creativity requirements of law.”
While the grant of a request for reconsideration is relatively rare, there are strategies and tactics that one may employ to improve the likelihood of success of a reconsideration request. Join seasoned practitioner Amy Goldsmith for practical insights on the types of works likely to be refused, arguments that have been successful in the past, and tips for preparing your next argument against the refusal.
Gain a general understanding of the types of works that are likely to be refused
Familiarize yourself with the specifics of arguments that have been successful in the past
Prepare your argument against the refusal
Successful, profitable businesses share certain characteristics: immediately recognizable brands, desirable products or services, and a strategic plan which minimizes legal risks. As co-chair of the Intellectual Property Group at Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, Amy B. Goldsmith partners with clients to provide practical legal advice and connections to grow their businesses. A strategic advisor, she guides clients in all stages of their development from idea conception and protection, to funding, manufacturing and enforcement. Copyrights and patents are an important part of a company’s strategy, and understanding when protection is likely (or not) to be granted is critical in the design process.
Her explanation of the cheerleader uniform case was particularly excellent. The idea of dividing the decorations from the product and analogizing it to standalone artwork is very helpful.
Good overview of the responsibilities regarding copyright law. Easy to understand as an attorney who does not practice in that area.
gave unique perspective on a convoluted subject... bravo!!
She did a good job of pointing out and repeating important practice points. Very helpful.
Thank you - very well organized and presented