Recent Developments in Title VII Jurisprudence Regarding LGBT Employees
1h
Created on June 23, 2017
Advanced
Overview
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., as amended, provides protection to employees from illegal discrimination and retaliation in the workplace on the basis of, among other protected categories, “gender” or “sex.” For decades, the Circuit Courts have all uniformly held that protection on the basis of sex under Title VII does not encompass sexual orientation discrimination claims, thereby preventing LGBT employees from mounting successful Title VII gender-related claims to remedy homophobia in the workplace. However, recent developments at the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and in reported cases at the district and circuit court level suggest that the courts may be re-thinking the narrow view of gender that has informed federal case law on this issue for so long.
This course, presented by Daniela
The cases to be discussed will include Hively v. Ivy Tech. Community College, a sexual orientation case that was dismissed by a three-member panel of the Fourth Circuit, which the Seventh Circuit then
Learning Objectives:
- Review EEOC’s 2012 decision in Macy v. Holder, and progeny, that now afford transgender workers protection under Title VII
- Gain insight into recently argued Fourth and Second Circuit cases where the plaintiffs are challenging the narrow reading of “sex” under Title VII and arguing that Title VII protects against sexual orientation discrimination
- Discuss developments at the district court level in other Circuits
- Provide practical guidance to attorneys evaluating potential claims on behalf of LGBT workers in light of recent developments
Gain access to this course, plus unlimited access to 2000+ courses, with an Unlimited Subscription.
Explore Lawline Subscriptions