This course focuses on a primary area of forensic psychology practice: forensic mental health assessment (FMHA). FMHA refers to the process mental health professionals engage in when conducting evaluations for the courts or for attorneys who have retained them. Forensic psychologists are not simply clinical psychologists practicing in the legal arena, and forensic evaluations are not just psychological evaluations for legal cases. Rather, forensic practitioners have specialized training and conduct evaluations in a manner distinct from traditional psychological assessments.
This course is provided by Daniel Agatino, Ph.D., Esq., a New Jersey-based criminal defense and entertainment/copyright law attorney, and Gianni Pirelli, Ph.D., a licensed psychologist who maintains a private forensic psychology practice in New Jersey. They address the distinctions between the forensic and therapeutic roles of mental health professionals, and highlight the significant differences in how forensic psychologists approach and conduct evaluations as compared to clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and psychotherapists. In addition, the instructors provide an overview of the types of criminal and civil psychological evaluations typically conducted by forensic psychologists, including but not limited to:
a. Criminal Competencies
b. Criminal Responsibility (e.g., Diminished Capacity, Insanity)
c. Sentencing Mitigation
a. Civil Commitment
b. Civil Competencies
c. Personal Injury
d. Workers’ Compensation and Employment Discrimination
e. Fitness for Duty
f. Firearm Evaluations
h. Domestic and Family Matters
I. Recognize the distinction between the roles of psychologists, psychiatrists, and therapists in criminal and civil matters
II. Appreciate Forensic Mental Health Assessments (FMHAs): what they are, when to use them, and how they are conducted
III. Grasp the different types of forensic psychological assessment approaches
IV. Identify the psychiatric disorders typically seen in criminal and civil cases
V. Understand the considerations relevant to the direct and cross-examination of psychological and psychiatric experts
the conversation presentation format is, in general, more engaging than the typical lecture format
Cross-discipline courses are always appreciated
Informative and interesting. Outstanding in every way.
Very informative and up to date.
Very well presented and informative.
It was good.
Good speakers; worked well together.
Great seminar. Best one so far.
Very helpful and interesting
I was impressed the speaker was sensitive to labeling people and displayed the wisdom of actually seeing people rather than just labels.
This was right on for one of my current courses. Thanks!
Presenters were stellar. One of the best programs thus far.
Fantastic course. Very good presentation.
Mr. Ferrelli came across very down to earth and real when he spoke about his role within the legal process. very interesting.
Fantastic job on this topic.
Good substance, but came across as a marketing piece.
Excellent presentation and highly relevant to my practice.
very interesting subject on something i have little involvement - good to learn new things!
This seminar started me to seriously consider using a forensic psychologist in some of my PI cases where there are PTSD type injuries. It was very informative.