Examining the Future of College Sports in the Wake of NCAA v. Alston
1h 1m
Created on August 10, 2021
Intermediate
$59
Overview
In late June 2021, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in NCAA v. Alston. In a striking defeat for the NCAA, the court clarified its views on the antitrust standard of review of policies of a sports organization and rejected the NCAA's argument that it was entitled to antitrust deference because of its idea of amateurism. Justice Kavanaugh's concurring opinion – which was even more critical of the NCAA's arguments – may open the door to more antitrust litigation against the venerable organization. Possibly in reaction to this ruling, the NCAA has allowed student-athletes to monetize their names, likenesses, and image. This ruling has opened a new era in college sports.
This program, taught by sports law attorney Mark Conrad, will benefit attorneys who wish to practice sports law or those who wish to represent student-athletes. It also may be of interest to anyone interested in sports governance.
Learning Objectives:
-
Discuss the background of NCAA vs. Alston
-
Analyze the high court's ruling and how it solidified the rule of reason standard for this type of case
-
Predict what the future will hold for college sports and the monetization rights of athletes
-
Examine Justice Kavanaugh's evisceration of the NCAA's business model
-
Reflect on the NIL universe
Gain access to this course, plus unlimited access to 2000+ courses, with an Unlimited Subscription.
Explore Lawline Subscriptions