On Demand Audio

Demystifying Music Copyrights

(768 reviews)

Produced on October 25, 2018

Taught by
$ 89 Intellectual Property and Patent In Stock
Get started now

$299 / year - Access to this Course and 1,500+ Lawline courses

or

Course Information

Time 1h 1m
Difficulty Intermediate
Topics covered in this course: Intellectual Property Patent

Course Description

Copyright protects the tangible expression of an idea. In the context of music, there is a life cycle that involves many different individuals and businesses, from the lyricist and composer to the vocalist, recording studios and production studios. Accordingly, there are many different types of copyright registrations that may be owned by these different interests. In the licensing context, performing rights organizations manage the use of recorded music in restaurants, bars, elevators, and other physical locations.

The Music Modernization Act of 2018 has been introduced to update the licensing system, particularly the statutorily prescribed rates and fees in the online world. In the litigation context, the situation is fractured, with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, 2-1, on March 21, 2018,  affirming the district court’s decision that the song Blurred Lines by Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke infringed Marvin Gaye’s Got To Give It Up. In this case, the issues involved the 1909 Act and the extent of the sheet music copyright, access to Marvin Gaye’s music, and how similarities between the music should be assessed. The Ninth is reviewing the jury’s decision against Spirit in its lawsuit against Stairway to Heaven by Led Zeppelin. Other cases involve Taylor Swift and the protection of short phrases. Join attorney Amy B. Goldsmith as she delves into the complex world of music copyrights. 



Learning Objectives:
  1. Appreciate the many types of music copyrights and the relationships between the various parties involved in the music industry
  2. Address the function of performing rights organizations
  3. Dissect the Music Modernization Act of 2018 and the CLASSICS Act
  4. Identify how different courts analyze music infringement

Credit Information

After completing this course, Lawline will report your attendance information to {{ accredMasterState.state.name }}. Please ensure your license number is filled out in your profile to ensure timely reporting. For more information, see our {{ accredMasterState.state.name }} CLE Requirements page . After completing this course, {{ accredMasterState.state.name }} attorneys self-report their attendance and CLE compliance. For more information on how to report your CLE courses, see our {{ accredMasterState.state.name }} CLE Requirements FAQ .

Faculty

Amy Goldsmith

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP

Successful, profitable businesses share certain characteristics: immediately recognizable brands, desirable products or services, and a strategic plan which minimizes legal risks. As co-chair of the Intellectual Property Group at Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, Amy B. Goldsmith partners with clients to provide practical legal advice and connections to grow their businesses. A strategic advisor, she guides clients in all stages of their development from idea conception and protection, to funding, manufacturing and enforcement. Copyrights and patents are an important part of a company’s strategy, and understanding when protection is likely (or not) to be granted is critical in the design process.



Reviews

GM
gerard m.

Complex subject instructor made it clear

AP
Antonious P.

One of the best ever explanations of music copyrights!

JW
Jay W.

Well presented & very interesting subject matter.

AK
Afsaneh Lynne K.

This was an interesting lecture. It was just out of my practice area, but I enjoyed it.

TT
Thomas T.

Thanks

DH
Deborah H.

A clear and comprehensive look at a complicated area of copyright..

MD
Malcolm D.

I really enjoyed the current case law and explanation on issues involved in similar sounding songs. Very informative and helpful.

WB
william f b.

I would recommend only to an attorney in the music business.

JM
John M.

very detailed by an obviously knowledgeable lawyer.

CB
Cynthia B.

This was a really interesting presentation!

RB
Robert B.

Great Stuff!

JB
john b.

nice to have some current jurisprudence

BD
Beth Florence D.

Excellent, thoughtful, thank you

AW
Ann W.

Very interesting area of law.

EA
Eva A.

Very informative up to date presentation

SM
Stephanie M.

Great!!!

AF
Aubrey F.

Good

JW
Jennie W.

very good course

MS
Mary Jo S.

This course was so interesting. Thanks for offering it.

SD
Shena D.

Excellent presenter

RR
R. Christopher R.

Fantastic and highly informative!

CC
Christopher R. C.

Super presentation. Thank you.

ML
Mark L.

Nice presentation

EM
Erin M.

very informative. enjoyed learning about an area of law I have little experience in.

RL
Rebecca L.

I really enjoyed listening to the speaker. This is not my normal substantive area of law, but I am an avid music listener and appreciated knowing this information presented in an interesting and informative format.

KU
Kristina U.

Speaker really knows her subject and taught it well

RN
Robert N.

interesting material

EB
Earl B.

good update on VERY recent holdings

JB
Jessica B.

Interesting course.

MB
Megan B.

Very interesting!

TO
Tony O.

Ms. Goldsmith is always very good.

Load More