On Demand Audio

Alternative Fee Arrangements that Don't Run Afoul of the Ethical Rules Update

(2631 reviews)

Produced on June 08, 2017

$ 59 Ethics and Law Practice Management In Stock
Get started now

$299 / year - Access to this Course and 1,500+ Lawline courses

or

Course Information

Time 61 minutes
Difficulty Intermediate

Course Description

Practicing law is more competitive than ever and there are rumors that AI may be utilized for basic legal research and discovery. With the advent of technology and a lowered proclivity by clients to pay for time, law firms with traditional billing practices may find it difficult to compete. While blended rates can make the pain of exchanging time for money less painful, it may not go far enough. In some instances, attorneys may want to consider alternative billing arrangements. Join attorneys Rania Sedhom, Managing Partner and Ginger Mimier, Senior Associate of Sedhom Law Group, A Bespoke Law Firm as they illustrate the benefits of alternative fee arrangements (AFAs), ethical considerations in creating AFAs, and highlights from some successful alternative client relationships. The presentation explores the ever-increasing popularity of a still under-utilized approach to the practice of law. Learn how to create an AFA without running afoul of the ABA’s ethical rules. Distinctions or parallels (as applicable) from New York and Massachusetts  are also explored.

Learning Objectives:

  1. Grasp the legal and business framework for sustainable and profitable AFAs
  2. Discuss the ABA rules that govern alternative fee arrangements
  3. Distinguish and draw parallels for New York and Massachusetts ethical rules
  4. Understand the most important ingredients to ethical alternative billing arrangements
  5. Examine alternative fee arrangements through real world examples of success (and failures)

Credit Information

After completing this course, Lawline will report your attendance information to {{ accredMasterState.state.name }}. Please ensure your license number is filled out in your profile to ensure timely reporting. For more information, see our {{ accredMasterState.state.name }} CLE Requirements page . After completing this course, {{ accredMasterState.state.name }} attorneys self-report their attendance and CLE compliance. For more information on how to report your CLE courses, see our {{ accredMasterState.state.name }} CLE Requirements FAQ .

Faculty

Rania V. Sedhom

Sedhom Law Group, PLLC

Rania V. Sedhom, Managing Partner of the firm, is an attorney who provides practical and efficient solutions to complex problems. Rania has extraordinary interpersonal skills that allow her to forge win-win relationships across diverse organizations and cross-functional stakeholders. She is also a skilled legal and business commentator with appearances on national print and TV media, including L.A. Times, the Chicago Tribune, the Baltimore Sun, Forbes, Inc., Business Week, and CNN Money. 

 Rania is admitted to the Bars of the State of New York and New Jersey, the Eastern District of New York, the Southern District of New York, the District of New Jersey and the Third Circuit. Rania attended Syracuse University College of Law, where she was Editor of The Labor Lawyer and The Digest and served as Vice-Justice of the Phi Alpha Delta Law Fraternity. Prior to law school, Rania attended Columbia University where she majored in political science.



Ginger Mimier

Kilpatrick Townsend

Ginger Mimier focuses her practice on intellectual property and internet law. She represents and counsels clients on  matters including trademark prosecution and enforcement, copyright enforcement, and Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) disputes.

Prior to joining the firm, Ginger was a senior associate at a law firm based in New York City where her practice focused on trademark, domain names, copyright, and privacy law, as well as drafting and negotiating intellectual property-related agreements. Previously, Ginger worked as a staff attorney in the Boston, Massachusetts office of an international law firm where she focused her practice on intellectual property litigation. Ginger is also a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US).

While attending law school, Ginger was Articles Editor of the Journal of Law Reform. She also served as a judicial intern for the Honorable John Daniel Tinder in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.



Reviews

AV
Alberto V.

Although ethics can be boring the speakers made it tolerable.

LT
Lynne T.

Thank you!

DM
Danielle M.

It was helpful that they provided actual factual examples.

AP
Adam P.

Great app — well designed

WW
Weston W.

These attorneys offered a great deal of insight into how alternative fee arrangements trigger obligations under the ethical rules, with a focus on tech, large, and startup client arrangements. Even though they did not highlight CA rules, and there are distinctions, it was easy to follow their presentation and find it helpful.

JD
John D.

I learned a lot of new possibilities for alternative fee arrangements that I had not considered.

KO
Kenneth O.

Both speakers were both knowledgeable and entertaining. Great presentation.

HV
Hermon V.

great job by both.

PM
Patric M.

Loved these lawyers - great job!

RB
Randy B.

Great work.

RW
Rufus W.

Thoughtful and entertaining

MC
Michael C.

useful, practical information

JG
Joseph G.

Very good coverage.

ES
Elizabeth S.

This was fantastic! Entertaining and the presenters did a great job with the material.

DG
Daniel G.

great job

BS
Benjamin S.

Good session - thank you!

GL
Guy L.

Excellent course. Important whether you're a partner, associate or solo.

WF
Walter F.

Both presenters knowledgeable and did an excellent job. Materials were very well organized and useful. Thank you.

JW
Jeanne C. W.

The faculty was very energetic which was great!

KM
Khristine M.

The speakers worked well together.

DR
Demetri R.

Good discussion on fee arrangements

RK
Robert K.

Very good!

PO
Patrick O.

Nice pair of speakers. I learned a lot. Thanks!

LL
Lewis L.

Enjoyed the presenters

JB
James B.

Speakers provided solid information in a lively and thorough manner.

TL
Theodore L.

Two voices added value, close attention to practical details plus ethics rules.

TW
Thaddeus W.

Very good instructors.

DW
David W.

Excellent seminar. Informative. Great persenters. Important topic and warnings and information highlights regarding pitfalls or potential problems.

DH
Donald H.

Very interesting.

LS
Leonard S.

well presented as a team While substantive, the materials were presented in a easy going manner. great faculty

PA
Peter A.

Good variety of fee arrangements covered with illustrative examples.

PF
Peggy F.

Very Informative course.

FV
Frederic V.

nice program

RG
Robert G.

Great Presentation

LP
Luis P.

Very informative!

AM
Alan M.

Much more interesting than I thought it would be!

DC
Daniel C.

Nice logical class

HC
Howard C.

Possibly the best CLE presentation I have attended in years. The subject was very timely and relevant to my practice and the both speakers had an impressive grasp of the material.

JK
Jeffrey K.

Impressive handout

SP
shawn p.

very good content

RS
Robert S.

Great course

PM
Polly M.

speakers were great and personable...

JP
Jason P.

Great information

FK
Frederick K.

Helpful and effective program.

BM
Brook M.

Good presentation and explanation of options.

SK
Sandra K.

Good course.

JH
Joshua H.

Well run course.

RH
Ray H.

good info

SK
Scott K.

Great format.

JA
James A.

useful

SM
Stephane M.

Extremely engaging lecturers. Will be searching for more of their courses.

JJ
Joey J.

Informative

CK
Chris K.

Interesting situations talked about that I had not considered.

FH
Frederick H.

Excellent Presentation. Nice humor and glibness which added to the enjoyment of the class

LH
Lawrence H.

It was so refreshing for the presenter not to simply read her powerpoint but speak directly.

JH
John H.

Important material

MG
Mary E G.

Well-presented

JR
john a redmon r.

good program

RN
Richard S. N.

great --

TM
Thomas M.

Instructor was exceptional; the content was current and on point.

LT
Lurese T.

The speakers were very engaging for this complex and often dry topic.

PP
Paul P.

Thank you.

KK
Kenneth K.

great presentation

RL
robert l.

Lively and practical discussion!

DF
David F.

Excellent

JE
Jennifer E.

Fantastic

MA
Mattie A.

Excellent

RM
Robert M.

Good coverage of billing practices under ethics rules.

BK
Briana K.

This was definitely relevant to any attorney trying to create a practice.

HG
Henry G.

Excellent informative practical course.

CS
carlos s.

Swift and straight forward

EK
Erik K.

Good broad overview of alt fee ideas and tips on client management.

MF
michael f.

well informed. smooth presentation.

KR
Kenneth R.

They covered a lot of issues very efficiently. Good job!

AM
Annette M.

Very nice presentation.

AS
Allan S.

They covered a lot of material in a relatively short time.

MW
Merrick W.

Nice overview of factors to consider.

CH
Caroline H.

This was the best CLE I have taken on Lawline. Thank you.

Load More