During the course of the House's Impeachment Inquiry, there has been some debate about whether the evidence introduced by either side is relevant, hearsay, or prejudicial. This program will analyze the evidence contained in the House majority and minority reports, the deposition transcripts and the public testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidence to determine what evidence would be admissible. The lecture will also delve into matters of trial strategy and arguments as to the weight of the evidence. The program, taught by criminal defense attorney Stephen L. Richards, is intended as a learning tool rather than as a political tract and takes no position as to whether Donald Trump should be impeached or removed from office.
Areas of Practice
• Murder -- Homicide -- Death Penalty Cases
• Serious Felonies
• Drug / Weapons Cases
• Appeals -- Post-Convictions
• Sentencing -- Mitigation
• Civil Rights/1983
• Legal Education
• Legal Ethics
• 100% of Practice Devoted to Litigation
Certified Legal Specialties
• Certified Lead Counsel, Capital Litigation Trial Bar, Illinois Supreme Court, 2001
• Illinois, 1985
• U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois, 2008
• Brooklyn Law School, Brooklyn, New York
o J.D. - 1983
o Honors: Order of Barristers, Moot Court
• University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
o Honors: With Honors
o Major: History
• Reasonable Doubt Redux, 34 John Marshall L. Rev. 495, 2001
• The Admissibility of Expert Testimony, American Bar Association, 2003
• People v. Terry Griggs, 152 Ill.2d 1, 604 N.E.2d 257 (Ill. S. Ct. 1992)
• People v. Arthur King, 154 Ill.2d 217, 608 N.E.2d 877 (Ill. S. Ct. 1993)
• New Ideas for Jury Selection, Illinois Public Defender Association, 2007
• Capital Jury Selection, Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal, 2007
Honors and Awards
• Kutak-Dodds Award, Defender Prize, National Legal Aid and Defender Association, 2003
Professional Associations and Memberships
• Illinois Public Defender Association, President, 2006 - 2008
• Illinois Public Defender Association, Board Member, 2000 - Present
Past Employment Positions
• Office of the State Appellate Defender, Deputy Defender, 2000 - 2008
• Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender, Assistant Public Defender, 1989 - 2000
A lot of detail and analysis. Very interesting.
Good premise but, at times, confusing application
Interesting look at the impeachment process and how it could have been different. Sigh.
Very interesting, non-political information
Very thorough and fantastic class!
The best legal seminar ever--so original and lots of fun to watch.
The best presentation I've heard on Lawline.
Great course and content! Very informative!
This guy knows his stuff very well done! I really enjoyed it and learned much from it. Thank you! Professor!
Interesting intellectual exercise and very timely!
Very interesting lecture. Excellent speaker.
Thanks for this timely piece
So great! I have been wanting this content. A fellow political junkie taking a thought experiment with me. And refreshing my memory of the rules of evidence. Just great.
Topical and interesting
Excellent use of the Federal Rules of Evidence!!!
Extremely well done.
Great presentation. Thank you.
Timely, informative and interesting! The written materials provide a detailed timeline of the Ukraine scheme. Richards even analyzed the admissibility of news that broke the night before this webinar aired.
Extremely interesting way to present the federal rules through events that are of high interest
If said friends were interested.
fascinating and timely