This course is no longer available for credit on our site. Here are some similar courses you might be interested in:
This program is the second in a multi-part curriculum on investment-treaty law and arbitration by Stephen Anway, partner at Squire Patton Boggs and the 2014 Client Choice Award winner for arbitration in New York. Whereas the first program provided a general overview to investment treaty law, the circumstances in which investment treaty protection is triggered, and jurisdictional bases of investment-treaty arbitration, this second program focuses on situations in which acts are attributable to the State under public international law, which State acts are capable of violating investment-treaties, and how investment treaty tribunals have interpreted the substantive protections of investment-treaties.
With the explosion in the number of investment-treaties in the last two decades (now totaling more than 3,000), an increasing number of foreign investors began bringing treaty claims against host countries at the start of the 21st century. The arbitral tribunals were thus called upon to write awards in which they ruled for the investor or the country and, in so doing, developed a body of case law regarding which States acts can violate public international law and interpreting these treaty provisions, applying them to common fact patterns. That body of case law—which consists of more than 400 awards—informs our understanding of which acts are attributable to the State under public international law, which acts undertaken by the State (assuming attribution) are capable of violating investment-treaties, and the content of countries’ obligations under investment-treaties. In this program, Mr. Anway analyzes these issues and discusses how international tribunals have analyzed them in arbitral awards.
In this course, Mr. Anway reviews:
I. Grasp which State acts are capable of violating an investment-treaty
II. Distinguish between the issue of State attribution and the issue of whether an act is an exercise of the State’s imperium or a commercial act
III. Understand the substantive protections given to investors in investment treaties
IV. Recognize how tribunals have interpreted substantive protections of investment-treaties in practice
V. Understand which State actions are likely to be considered a violation of an investment treaty
Stephen Anway is Co-Head of Investment Arbitration and a partner in Squire Patton Boggs’ world-ranked international arbitration group. He has represented the winning party in many of the largest international arbitrations in the world over the past 15 years. Mr. Anway has worked in more than 30 countries and has represented clients – including 10 different sovereign nations and numerous foreign investors – in more than 75 international arbitration proceedings. Those cases include arbitrations brought under more than 10 different investment treaties, free-trade agreements and the Energy Charter Treaty. Every year, Mr. Anway teaches a 13-week doctrinal course on international arbitration at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, where he serves as an Adjunct Professor of Law.
Mr. Anway specializes in both investment treaty arbitration and international commercial arbitration. His investment-treaty arbitration experience includes representing the Czech Republic in three major cases in 2009, 2012, and 2013 (each worth approximately $100 million). The Czech Republic fully defeated the claims in each of them. More recently, he acted as counsel for the Slovak Republic in two billion-dollar investment treaty arbitrations, both resulting in major wins for the Slovak Republic, and for the Republic of Kosovo, which resulted in a full victory for Kosovo. He was also counsel to the Republic of Ecuador in a billion-dollar arbitration, which resulted in the then largest annulment in ICSID history in favor of Ecuador.
Mr. Anway also specializes in high-stakes natural gas price review arbitrations. In 2013, he acted as counsel in an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration in which his client won more than $395 million. That award followed another ICC decision in August 2012, which awarded his client $580 million. Mr. Anway was also counsel for the winning party in two different UNCITRAL awards worth over $1 billion—one in 2005 and one in 2008.
In December 2017, Law360 named Stephen as one of the top three MVPs in international arbitration in the world. In August 2017, Who’s Who Legal named Stephen to its list of Arbitration Future Leaders 2018. He received the same honor in 2017. In March 2016, Law360ranked Stephen as one of the top 10 international arbitration lawyers under the age of 40. In February 2016, the National Law Journal named him one of the top 50 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) lawyers. In June 2015, The American Lawyer awarded Stephen the Arbitration Award at its inaugural Transatlantic Legal Awards dinner in London. In both 2014 and 2015, the International Law Office awarded him the Client Choice Award for the Arbitration category in New York. In 2014, Crain’s Business named him to its Forty under 40. In June 2013, The American Lawyer Arbitration Scorecard published its list of the 20 Largest Commercial Arbitration Awards ever captured by the publication (dating back to 2001), and Mr. Anway represented the winning party in three of them.
Unlimited CLE Subscription gives you access to take almost any course from our catalog and earn as much CLE credit as you need.