on an array of different topics. Choose from the categories above or just view the most recent articles here.
Posted: June 26th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Opinion Corner, The News Beat
As the US Supreme Court nears the end of this term, we have received decisions on many of the major cases it has heard recently. Here is a shortlist of the winners and losers in each.
1. Exxon Valdez Punitive Damages Slashed to $507 Million. Originally ordered to pay punitive damages of $2.5 billion for an oil spill in 1989, the Supreme Court has given Exxon the benefit of the doubt in a 5-3 decision. Winners: Exxon Valdez. Losers: The Environment.
2. DC Gun Ban Tossed Out. A 32-year ban on handguns for individual civilians in DC was ruled unconstitutional and a direct violation of the second amendment right to bear arms. Winners: Gun Manufacturers, an Old Piece of Paper. Losers: The American People.
3. No Death Penalty for Child Rapists. The Supreme Court called the death penalty “cruel and unusual punishment” in cases of child rape. In rare agreement, both presidential candidates Obama and McCain condemned the decision. Winners: Not Really Sure. Losers: Children and their Parents.
Post a Comment |
(0) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Is the Legal Field Facing a Supply and Demand Imbalance of Top Talent?
Posted: June 25th, 2008
By: Charles Volkert, Esq.
Category: Law Firms, Law School, Opinion Corner
· Despite a cautious economy, demand for newly minted lawyers with the most sought-after skills and a top-tier education remains strong and is expected to outpace the supply. In addition to law degrees, the most desirable and marketable candidates also possess degrees in biology, chemistry or other sciences and technology, which allow them to better represent clients in the pharmaceutical, healthcare, biotechnology and technology industries.
· Many midlevel associates are leaving within three or four years of taking a job at a law firm. The reasons given for switching firms included a desire to move to a different geographic location, pursuit of new practice interests, change to another type of legal job, cost-of-living issues and student debt. Other factors were high billable expectations, communication problems within a firm, lack of transparency about the firm’s finances and the relatively low probability of making partner. Other midlevel associates and senior attorneys are leaving the profession entirely. Among minority associates, attrition rates are even steeper. Seasoned attorneys opt out for many of the same reasons that others make lateral moves, including changing priorities, a search for different opportunities and the desire for better work-life balance. Because attrition has historically been the cost of doing business, the financial impact of unwanted or excessive attrition can be severe. It has been estimated that the economic cost of losing an attorney may range from $300,000 to $700,000.
Post a Comment |
(0) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Smokers Need Not Apply at Rogers Towers
Posted: June 24th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Law Firms, SHOWCASE CORNER
Aside from smoking in designated non-smoking areas and buildings, you can’t really get in trouble for smoking cigarettes. The tobacco industry is one of the largest in the country despite the vast amount of information available on the negative effects of cigarette smoke on the human body. Well, a Florida law firm is taking a stand against cigarette smoking by implementing a new hiring strategy.
Rogers Towers, a well known law firm based in Jacksonville, FL, is no longer hiring smokers starting on July 1, 2008. “It is strictly a decision to employ healthier workers,” explains Rogers Towers attorney Allan Geiger, “we are trying to help people be more healthy by giving them incentives to quit.” It was a decision that seems to fit in with the culture of the law firm overall.
The firm, which is involved in many activities promoting healthier lifestyles, is now taking the next step. Though the new policy will not apply to those smokers who already work at the firm, Rogers Towers does offer to pay for programs that help employees quit the habit. But starting in July, if an interviewee turns out to be a cigarette smoker, they will not get the job.
Florida has one of the lowest tobacco taxes in the country, which leads to a large cigarette consumption in the state. Over 1.3 billion packs of cigarettes were purchased just last year. But the winds of change are blowing. In 2007, Florida passed a constitutional amendment forcing state spending on anti-cigarette programs and campaigns.
The new Rogers Towers anti-smoking policy, though not aimed at infringing on others, will spark discussion on both sides of the issue. Murray Schwartz, a renowned employment discrimination prosecutor in New York sees this as a potential issue. “Since smoking cigarettes is not against the law, it is unlikely that you can judge someone’s employment potential based solely on whether or not they smoke,” he explained. He says that even though no law exists against this type of policy, it is a potential problem to even ask if a potential hire smokes cigarettes during the interview process.
This is an issue that is sure to spark ongoing discussion, but in the end it is a move that puts healthy living into the minds of more people. And for a country with a significant amount of health issues, this is a bold step that deserves our attention, if not praise. As Allan Geiger puts it, “In the end, it is really all about making people healthier.”
Post a Comment |
(3) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Democratization of Assets Makes Fastcase the Wave of the Future
Posted: June 18th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Career Corner, SHOWCASE CORNER
“What we try to do here is use new technology to make legal research easier and faster,” explains CEO Ed Walters. Eight and a half years after its inception, the company is pushing forward faster than ever. They currently have 300,000 subscribers, most of which come from Bar Association memberships who offer it free for their members. For example, if you are a member of the Virginia State Bar, you have access to all of Fastcase’s services for free.
The theory, an easily searchable database of case law, with results displayed exactly the way you need them, is catching on at firms who have been hesitant to change. They allow each user to customize their search results through a number of different ways, including showing those cases that are cited the most first. This makes sorting through cases faster and more efficient, saving lawyers time and money.
There is no new system to learn, no extensive training required, and the future is very bright. They are introducing a new interactive timeline display, as a much more appealing way to view search results. This viewer display cases in a search along a timeline, charting the cases relevance as compared to similar results. This makes finding the right cases easier than ever before.
In addition, Fastcase plans to launch a new service later this year. State statutes, which have previously been difficult to find and maneuver on the web, will now be part of the Fastcase database. Statutes from all 50 states will be searchable, and easily viewed on the website. This is a great addition to Fastcase’s extensive information center, which includes the largest free law library in the world, located at plol.org. “We are democratizing the assets of the law,” Ed says as he explains why people have found Fastcase to be so helpful. It is clear that there is a new face in the legal research industry that will be here to stay.
Post a Comment |
(4) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
CLE in the News: June 17, 2008
Posted: June 17th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: CLE Programming, The News Beat
The Wisconsin Continuing Legal Education requirement is 30 credits every two years, including 3 hours of legal ethics. The reason I bring this up is because a Wisconsin criminal attorney made news this week for failing to comply with his CLE Requirements. The story, outlined in the Wisconsin Law Journal, explains that the attorney, Paul Polacek, currently has multiple cases pending.
His suspension, though it may be short, has resulted in a delay in at least one of his cases. He missed the February 1 reporting date, but claims that he has since completed his requirements and is waiting for approval. If Wisconsin allowed their CLE credits to be completed online, Mr. Polacek could have easily completed his credits quickly and easily on Lawline.com. Maybe next time.
Post a Comment |
(2) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Warner Norcross & Judd Take On Climate Change
Posted: June 16th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Law Firms, SHOWCASE CORNER
There is no debating that climate change is a topic that the whole world needs increased awareness. And with a growing movement the size of this one, there is sure to be plenty of legislation to come in the area. To date, there has been very little signed into law in the area of climate change. But that does not mean that lawyers and law firms should not be actively pursuing the field.
One law firm that is taking advantage of this opportunity is Warner Norcross & Judd. The Michigan based firm has formed a Climate Change Practice Group that is built to handle their clients’ many needs in regards to climate change. With one of the largest Environmental Law Practices around, Warner Norcross brings to the table the experience needed to serve companies and industries devoted to climate change initiatives.
“Right now it is our job to keep these clients informed and let them know what to look for,” said Climate Change Practice Group chair Daniel DeWitt, “the nature of our services will be shaped by the coming legislation.” For now, they are concentrated on looking out for the best interests of clients that fall into the broad realm of climate change. They have helped negotiate alternative energy contracts and green building designs.
The Climate Change Practice Group is a cross-discipline group made up of environmental law practitioners, litigators, corporate attorneys, and real estate attorneys. Also, there are lawyers in the group from the Government Affairs Practice that spend time lobbying for certain climate change issues.
Post a Comment |
(3) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Brown Rudnick's Commitment to Clean Technology
Posted: June 13th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Law Firms, The News Beat
Green is the new White. As the push towards sustainability and renewable energies becomes more mainstream, companies in those emerging sectors need legal representation. More and more, large white collar law firms are setting up practices to deal with these types of clients.
One law firm that has excelled in this area is Brown Rudnick LLP. Brown Rudnick, an international law firm with offices in the US and Europe, has created a Cleantech team comprised of lawyers across a broad range of practice areas. The newly formed team is charged with serving the needs of companies and investors within the emerging clean technology sector.
“Cleantech can mean a lot of different things,” says Mark Dorff, one of the team’s practice leaders, “we look at ourselves as a service provider, serving the infinite needs of clients within this sector.” Mark is a partner who works out of the firm’s London office. He works as a practice leader for the Cleantech team, responsible for coordinating cross-disciplinary initiatives for many clients.
The Cleantech Team at Brown Rudnick is involved with three main categories of clients. The first is entrepreneurs and businesses in the clean technology sector, including wind farms and other technologies that are working towards efficiency. The second are the investors, such as private equities and venture capitalists, who are investing in clean technology. The third category is comprised of financial intermediaries working with companies in this important sector.
One of the major things that makes the Cleantech Team work is the experience that Brown Rudnick brings to the table. Though this team is newly created, it includes a broad group of practices that have been well established for up to 20 years. It is part of a commitment by the firm to serve the needs of these clients on a larger scale.
In the broad scope of green initiatives, this is a very important area. As law firms strive to serve the needs of green companies, and begin to implement initiatives to go green themselves, we must remember that it takes commitment. Commitment to clients, commitment to moving forward, and a commitment to the community as a whole will prove to be vital. And in the end, it just makes sense, both financially and operationally.
Post a Comment |
(1) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Thursday Attorney Malpractice Update 6/12/08
Posted: June 12th, 2008
By: Andrew Bluestone, Esq.
Category: Attorney Malpractice
Pennsylvania Legal Malpractice and Ballard Spahr
Law.Com reports that the law firm of Ballard Spahr won a jury trial yesterday. Beyond the usual legal malpractice issues and testimony, there was plenty of star power [in a law sort of way] as " famed Florida litigator Roy Black of Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf represented Epstein along with Boca Raton-based Lance W. Shinder and local counsel Marc R. Steinberg, managing partner of Rubin Glickman Steinberg & Gifford in Lansdale, Pa.
His attorneys said in court documents that Crusader was never mentioned at the meeting with Epstein and Kaplinsky and that Epstein met with Crusader, and its then-executive -- now gubernatorial candidate -- Tom Knox, on his own in February 1999. "
"A Montgomery County jury vindicated Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll on Monday in a breach of fiduciary duty suit brought against the firm by a man seeking between $17 million to $30 million in lost profits plus interest and punitive damages.
Plaintiff Saul R. Epstein originally claimed the firm and Alan S. Kaplinsky, the firm's consumer financial services group chairman, committed legal malpractice, breached their fiduciary duty and interfered with a prospective contractual relationship, according to court documents. In Epstein v. Kaplinsky, Epstein claimed the firm shared his prospective business interests with another firm client involved in similar work, according to court documents.
An 11-to-1 jury found that Ballard Spahr owed a duty to Epstein but found by the same margin that neither Kaplinsky nor the firm breached that duty, according to Ballard Spahr partner Darryl May who acted as in-house counsel for the firm during the case. "
Right to Independent Counsel in Malpractice Cases
This case, Elacqua v. Physicians Reciprocal Insurers is a medical malpractice matter, in which the doctors had both covered and non-covered claims against them Naturally, the insurance company had coverage for certain of the claims. Although this case is in the medical malpractice area, it is fully applicable to legal malpractice.
The insurer was under an obligation to inform the doctors that they could have independent counsel, at the insurer's cost, to represent them. The failure to inform the doctors could amount to deceptive business practices under Business Law 349.
The NYLJ reports: "Drs. Mary S. Elacqua and William Hennessey alleged deceptive business practices because they were not told they were entitled to choose independent counsels, at the insurance company's expense, to represent them when a conflict of interest arose between covered and uncovered claims in the malpractice case against them. They were each represented by lawyers assigned by their insurance company.
The state Court of Appeals recognized the obligation by an insurer to provide independent representation to insureds in Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Goldfarb, 53 NY2d 392 (1981), the Third Department panel said.
Yet, according to last week's ruling, a lawyer for Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers and the company's general counsel both acknowledged that its "practice is not to inform its insureds with whom it has conflicts that they have the right to select independent counsel at defendant's expense." In fact, the Third Department noted that in a 2005 ruling in the same case, Elacqua v. Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers, 21 AD3d 707, it confirmed that insurers have an "affirmative obligation" to inform insureds of their rights.
"Here, the partial disclaimer letters sent by defendant to its insureds - including plaintiffs - failed to inform them that they had the right to select independent counsel at defendant's expense, instead misadvising that plaintiffs could retain counsel to protest their uninsured interests 'at [their] own expense,'" Justice Karen K. Peters wrote for the panel. "Equally disturbing is the fact that defendant continued to send similar letters to its insureds, failing to inform them of their rights, even after this Court's pronouncement in Elacqua I."
Bankruptcy Trustee's Action in Legal Malpractice against Alston & Bird
Law.Com reports that "Alston & Bird and and the bankruptcy trustee for one of its former clients, the beleaguered Friedman's Jewelers Inc., are on the verge of settling a suit over allegations that the firm committed legal malpractice. "
"Alston & Bird, which served as Friedman's outside general counsel from the 1990s until the company terminated their relationship in 2004, contributed to some of those troubles, according to Alan Cohen, Friedman's bankruptcy trustee. He filed a complicated adversary complaint on behalf of the Friedman's Creditor Trust against the law firm and five other defendants in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia in January 2007.
The first claim is that Alston & Bird committed legal malpractice by failing to disclose material facts related to Friedman's $85 million investment in Crescent Jewelers Inc., which became irrecoverable when Crescent declared bankruptcy in 2004.
In the second claim, the trustee complains about the fees Alston charged Friedman's. He claims that Alston took $5 million in legal fees but did not give an equivalent value of services. In the third claim, the trustee alleges that Friedman's -- while it was insolvent -- paid Alston almost $700,000. That's more than the company should have paid, given its financial posture, under the Bankruptcy Code, according to the trustee.
Now, more than a year later, the parties are close to striking a deal to resolve those disputes. "
Legal Malpractice, Judiciary Law 487 and Frivolous Conduct
The case of Rozen v. Nite Rider Group, Inc. seems to be going on in three different venues. There was the original case, based on loans and property noldings, there is a legal malpractice case, and apparently there is also a Judiciary Law 487 case too. "This motion by former defense counsel, Russ & Russ, P.C., Jay Edmond Russ, Daniel P. Rosenthal, Kenneth J. Lauri and Ira Levine, (the Russ attorneys), for an order dismissing the parties' motions for sanctions on the moving parties for engaging in frivolous conduct as defined in 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, or, in the alternative, staying a hearing on the aforesaid motions, dated March 18, 2008, and March 24, 2008, until a decision is rendered on the Russ attorneys' motions to dismiss the complaint in an action brought against them by Rozen for breach of section 487 of the Judiciary Law (pending under Index Number 19442/2007), and another action brought against them for malpractice (pending under Index Number 01462/2008)"
Here, "After the trial concluded, the plaintiffs became aware that a certain parcel of real property situate in Mattituck, New York, which had been the subject of financial transactions between the parties, and on which it was understood at the time of trial that defendant Sally Omar held an option, was no longer subject to that option. The option had, on May 12, 2007, been assigned by Omar to her attorneys, seemingly in lieu of payment of fees. Plaintiffs assert that settlement offers extended to the Omar defendants, and their business entities, were not transmitted to them by defense counsel insofar as the offers involved the Mattituck property to which the defendants no longer held any interest."
Now, sanctions are sought against the attorneys, even though they are no longer in the case. "In March of 2008 both the plaintiffs and the defendants moved for a hearing to impose sanctions on Russ & Russ, P.C., and those professionals affiliated with them, for engaging in [*2]litigation conduct which satisfies the definition of frivolous conduct as set forth in 22 NYCRR § 130-1.1. (Motion Sequence No. 008 and No. 009.). It is alleged that the conduct of the moving parties undermined the integrity of the judicial process and increased the legal fees of the plaintiffs. Specifically that : "It was the intention of the Russ & Russ Attorneys to take the option to the Mattituck property from the Omars and then cause the Rozens to incur extensive delays and expense so that they would relinquish their rights to the Mattituck property without the knowledge that the Russ & Russ Attorneys sought to develop and profiteer from the property." Rosen OSC dated March 18, 2008, ¶ 11. "
Post a Comment |
(0) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Lawline.com Launches Exclusive Online CLE Partnership with New York County Lawyers Association
Posted: June 11th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: CLE Programming, Lawline.com, Press Release
PRNewswire / New York, NY - June 10 -- Lawline.com, a leading online provider of continuing legal education and law-related programming, is proud to announce a partnership with the New York County Lawyers Association. Beginning June 1, 2008, Lawline.com started to broadcast NYCLA's lectures on its website. "We are looking forward to working with NYCLA, one of the city's oldest and most influential bar associations in the city," said David Schnurman, President of Lawline.com. "We are pleased to be able to offer NYCLA's extensive catalog of courses to our database of legal professionals.
In recognition of New York County Lawyers Associations' 100th year anniversary, Lawline.com will be offering a special introductory Centennial Anniversary Package to its subscribers. You can view the package, which includes all 24 Mandatory CLE Credits at http://www.lawline.com/cle/view-bundles.php?state=ny&category=24. "We are thrilled to be partnering with Lawline.com to bring quality CLE programming to the web," said Ann B. Lesk, President of NYCLA. "By merging NYCLA CLE Institute's superior content with Lawline.com's user-friendly technology, we are confident that we are forming an unbeatable combination."
Lawline.com's mission in partnering with NYCLA is to provide an online environment to facilitate the learning process through its high quality CLE programs that are intuitive and easy to use. Lawline.com reaches a national audience with courses approved in 36 states and currently offers hundreds of hours of CLE programming in all practice areas.
About Lawline
Lawline.com, based in New York, is the leading provider of online legal audio and video programming on the internet. Lawline.com's leadership in providing expert legal information and CLE programming has been recognized by American Lawyer Media, the New York Law Journal and the Social Law Library. In addition to providing legal education on the internet, Lawline is one of the first legal talk shows in the New York metropolitan area, with an inventory of over 500 programs over the last 25 years.
About New York County Lawyers Association
The New York County Lawyers' Association turns 100 years old this year. Throughout its history, NYCLA's bedrock principles have been the inclusion of all who wish to join and the active pursuit of legal system reform. Throughout its 100 years, NYCLA has been at the forefront of most legal debates in the country. The Association's founders were and their successors are dedicated to the highest standards for the legal profession and the preservation of justice for all.
Post a Comment |
(1) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
New Technology Landscape: Create Your Work-Life Balance
Posted: June 10th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Career Corner, Opinion Corner, Technology Corner
As a lawyer, you are never far away from your work. Essentially, to serve your clients best, you have to be available most of the time. It is a job and an industry that requires long hours and a lot of extra effort. And now, with new technology that makes working from home and on the road easier and more convenient than ever, that trend is only increasing.
Many people thought that with the onset of new technologies like cell phones, PDA’s, and virtual machines would limit work hours because it gives people more freedom. The result, however, was the opposite. All of the sudden, when you leave the office you are not leaving work behind. Hours got longer because the boundaries between work life and home life disappeared.
There have been many recent news stories about the excessive use of blackberries and mobile web devices to check email and catch up on work into the late hours of the night. It causes increased stress at home and limits time with family and friends when you used to be more available. This leads to unhappy spouses, limited time with children, and less free time during vacation or off days.
It is important to remember that technology is meant to help make our lives easier. Set limits on yourself when you are away from the office. Start out by trying to designate hours without any mobile devices. Focus your attention on family and non-work activities so you can get back into more of a balance between work and home. Though work is important, and the satisfaction of your clients is vital, you cannot let that take over your life. Technology is a great thing, just don’t let it control you.
Post a Comment |
(2) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Posted: June 6th, 2008
By: Frank Furbacher
Category: Business Development Skills, Career Corner, Entrepreneurship
Frank Furbacher Jr. is currently a senior at Manhattanville College. He is the President of the Student Government Association and a member of the varsity baseball team. Frank is an entrepreneur himself, and an aspiring law school student. You can contact Frank at Frank@lawline.com with any questions or comments.
Post a Comment |
(1) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Complete All Your Illinois Continuing Legal Education before the Deadline
Posted: June 5th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: CLE Programming, Lawline.com
CHICAGO, June 3 /PRNewswire/ -- For the first year ever, Illinois lawyers are required to complete mandatory Continuing Legal Education credits. The deadline, as imposed by the MCLE Board of Illinois, is June 30th. With the deadline so close and many attorneys still short on credits, Lawline.com is offering last minute savings on their Illinois One-Click Bundles.
Lawline.com hopes to show attorneys the many advantages of taking CLE courses online. First, it gives you more freedom to choose the course topics that are right for you. It offers the convenience of taking courses anywhere, anytime, without the hassle of traveling or rearranging your schedule. And with new technology, it is easier and more affordable than ever before.
Illinois CLE Bundles on Lawline.com fulfill all 20 MCLE credits, including 4 hours of Ethics/Professionalism. This offers a quick and easy way for attorneys to finish up their CLE requirements in the weeks leading up to the deadline. The cost of this bundle is only $299. You can view the Illinois Bundles at http://www.lawline.com/cle/view-bundles.php?category=25.
In addition to the Illinois Bundles, attorneys can choose to purchase a custom bundle of courses that are more interesting and relevant to their area of practice. This option can be attractive as they continue to grow their course offerings in the state of Illinois by partnering with local law firms and bar associations to deliver their programs online.
Lawline.com has been providing cutting-edge Continuing Legal Education courses online since 1999, the year the first mandatory requirements were introduced in New York. Since then, they have expanded to more than 30 states nationwide. Their courses give attorneys an easy to use, interesting, and up to date refresher of valuable legal topics.
Post a Comment |
(0) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Lawline.com Faculty Member in the News
Posted: June 5th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Career Corner, Lawline.com, Lawyer Profiles, The News Beat
Earlier this week, Melvyn Weiss, Plaintiff’s Attorney with the firm Milberg LLP, was sentenced to 30 months in jail for pleading guilty to participating in a conspiracy whereby plaintiffs were paid a kickback in lucrative class action settlements. His attorney, Ben Brafman, is a well respected criminal lawyer in New York, and a Lawline.com faculty member.
We caught up with Mr. Brafman earlier today and asked him about the sentence. He mentioned that the 30 months was below the maximum sought by the government of 33 months, but more than what he had been hoping for. He said that he understood why the court had imposed such a sentence, with Mr. Weiss’s age and years of respectable work helping to keep the sentence below the maximum that the government had been seeking.
Post a Comment |
(0) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Posted: June 4th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: The News Beat
A few weeks ago I posted an article about law firms going green. If you want to take a look, here it is. Well today I came across a blog that referenced a guide for law firms that are committed to going green. The guide, appropriately titled The Green Guide for Lawyers, can be downloaded for free from this website. It was put together by the Meritas Leadership Institute as a roadmap for lawyers and law firms who want to put in place the initiatives that it takes to start to be a green firm.
The document divides initiatives up into three tiers, and then categorizes them under the headings People, Planet, and Profit. It uses a Triple Bottom Line approach for law firms to measure their sustainability and environmental consciousness. I would recommend a quick read through of the guide to any lawyer who may think it is necessary to start to go green. It is not as hard as you may think.
Post a Comment |
(1) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Posted: June 2nd, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Business Development Skills, Career Corner, SHOWCASE CORNER
As lawyers, we are constantly seeking to improve ourselves professionally by learning how to serve our clients more effectively. Sometimes it can be a struggle to reach new clients, work through existing cases, and keep up with all of our professional relationships at once. Bounce takes you through stories of failure and success to show you that life is supposed to be made up of ups and downs. It is the low points that make you appreciate the high points, and the high points that keep you pushing forward through the low points.
True business confidence is developed through a number of different experiences, all of which lead you to where you are today, and where you will be in the years to come. Failure is no fun, we all know that. But it happens every day. Do not fear it or run from it, use it to drive you to success.



