on an array of different topics. Choose from the categories above or just view the most recent articles here.
Word Users Don’t Need Rubber Stamps
Posted: February 4th, 2009
By: Michael Ross
Category: Opinion Corner
The following article was written in response to our blog, Clean Lawyer: An Attorney's Guide to Going Green.
Ways to save money in these tricky economic times aren’t exactly obvious. Old habits are hard to break — like the one of using rubber stamps to mark documents, particularly multiple copies of a document. Hundreds of dollars per year can be saved by just eliminating one trip a day to a copy machine using an automated process. Untold amounts can be saved by preventing a copy from becoming an “original.”
Using rubber stamps is a very inefficient method of marking paper documents generated from a word processor. Moreover, unless the stamp obliterates part of a document’s content, it can’t keep the document’s use consistent with its intent. If a worker requires multiple copies of a document to be stamped and the document has multiple pages, each page requires identification if the document is to be secure and/or protected. Otherwise, at least the first page of each copy needs to be stamped. If copies of the document are intended for different recipients, the marking should so indicate, e.g. client copy, accounting, privileged, etc. This practice requires a collection of custom rubber stamps which is neither efficient or economic. And, depending on how the stamp is used, only marginally effective, if at all.
Rubber stamps in the margin or text in a footer offer little protection. In 2006, the Department of the Navy determined best practices dictated that documents should be properly marked “. . .before they are distributed. The reason is that not everyone is attuned to how to handle documents they receive… proper marking of documents alerts the recipient to any requirements that are attached to the document.” http://privacy.navy.mil/training/BestPrivacyPractices4A.ppt#335,3,BEST
Because many documents are more than 1 or 2 pages, the inclination is to mark the only first page of the document, e.g. “privileged.” If that marking (1) exists only on the first page and (2) is only in the margin, the document is one that, in paper form, can have its purpose or intent altered. Once done, the quality of digital copiers make distinction between the true “original” and a duplicate without marking, almost impossible. Rubber stamps, since they are usually placed in the margins of paper documents, do not provide for the protection of the document. Stamps require existence (i.e., the appropriate stamp) and manual application that costs time and money. It is worth noting that the average business document is copied 19 times.
While electronic documents provide a partial solution, a PDF cannot protect a paper document. As long as we continue to generate paper, today’s business and legal environments demand paper document integrity. Because a document is most vulnerable at the time of printing, its marking should be done at that time. Graphical marking by the word-processor and the printer is the only efficient method of preserving the integrity of paper documents when they are printed.
For more information, go to StampIt for Word at (http://www.stampitnet.com). StampIt provides a complete solution to paper document marking and signatures without the use of rubber stamps.
Post a Comment |
(0) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Comments
There are no comments for this post.

