Subscribe Via RSS RSS Feeds
About The Blog
The Legal Beat was developed as a way to showcase lawyers who have a certain level of expertise in a practice area. If you would like to be featured in an article, video, or podcast, click here.
Blog Categories

View All Categories

Attorney Malpractice
Business Development Skills
Career Corner
CLE Programming
Employment Law
Entrepreneurship
Friday Five
Law Firms
Law School
Lawline.com
Lawyer Profiles
Marketing Tips
Opinion Corner
Podcasts
Press Release
SEO
SHOWCASE CORNER
Technology Corner
The News Beat
Videos

Does Hourly Billing Make Sense?
Posted: January 28th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Career Corner, Law Firms, Opinion Corner

Does Hourly Billing Make Sense?

I recently read an opinion piece in the New York Law Journal about the practice of hourly billing.  I have always contended that there are major flaws in industries that bill clients by the hour as opposed to flat fee billing.  And this article, written by Steven G. Nachimson, discusses some of the major issues that need to be looked at when considering a change from this billing method.

First off, the major flaw of this system is that “it promotes inefficiency”.  In a system where the longer something takes, the more you get paid, there is no motivation to “finish” anything.  In essence, fees are not truly based on results or skill of the person.  Sure, someone who has more experience and is more successful will get more clients and therefore get the pay that they deserve, but an inefficient person can make more money by taking more time to complete certain tasks.

Law is just one example of where this “problem” exists.  A therapist, for example, has no motivation to get a client to stop coming back for more therapy.  In my opinion, a therapist should charge a flat fee, payable the day that therapy is no longer needed.  I think we would see a lot less people in therapy for long periods of time that way.

And in the law, it is the same problem.  The issue comes down to the motivation of the professional to get a job done.  A flat fee system may not work either but I think the process needs a second look.  In the article, Mr. Nachimson suggested that fixed fees make it easier for clients to see the value in legal representation, which is extremely important.  This is an issue that should be considered by many in the legal community.

Post a Comment   |   (2) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back

Comments
I don\'t know if it makes sense to charge a flat fee because so much of what law firms charge is based on dealing with things as they arise. Maybe a more structured fee could be set up but it would take a long time to plan out one that works.
Comment By: Darrel - January 29, 2008

My law firm does use a flat rate for certain business clients to start and adds fees based on "extra" work that is done. I think that is what this article was about.
Comment By: Anonymous - January 29, 2008

Search Posts
Recent Posts

View All Posts

Friday Five: Make Great First Impressions
Posted: May 16th, 2008

Thursday Attorney Malpractice Update 5/15/08
Posted: May 15th, 2008

What You Need to Know About Mortgages with Dave Muti
Posted: May 15th, 2008

The Chicken or the Egg: Will the End of the Billable Hour Come From Clients or From Law Firms?
Posted: May 14th, 2008

Hiring for E-Discovery Projects: Inside Tips from the experts at Jones Dykstra
Posted: May 13th, 2008

Archived Posts
2008


2007

Blogroll

Blawg Directory

Law.com Legal Blog Watch

Legal Business Development

Legal Marketing Blog (Tom Kane)

Make Rain Without the Pain

New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

TrueNYC Blog

WSJ Law Blog

Simple Justice

Amazing Firms, Amazing Practices

The Lawyer Coach

Adam Smith, Esq.

Profiting with Public Relations

Legal Ease Blog

Chuck Newton

Idealawg

The Mac Lawyer

Gersh Blog