Should We Charge President Bush with Murder?
Posted: September 24th, 2008
By: Christie LaBarca
Category: Lawyer Profiles, Opinion Corner
Bugliosi says, since President Bush played a role in recruiting soldiers from each state, technically any attorney general has the potential (and the jurisdiction) to file such a suit. Additionally, Bush in a sense duped the public (people of each individual state) into believing Sadam Hussein was an immediate threat and that a war in Iraq would be a response to the terrorist attacks that occurred in the United States.
On one hand, it seems as if the candidate should concentrate on issues in Vermont that need attention. Hatred for President Bush, however, seems to be widespread in Vermont. The state actually had the most proponents for the impeachment of the president. It is also the only state he has not visited as President. The idea does seem to be a little far-fetched, but could it really happen? As much as many of us have aversions towards Bush, we have to question, what type of precedent would this create? Attorneys would evermore have the ability to manipulate the situation to prosecute any leader for bad choices. Future presidents will develop more fears about entering a war, even if it entrance may be necessary.
An additional issue that has plagued me is whether in twenty or so years Bush will still be viewed as a terrible president. Sometimes looking back in hindsight, we see why leaders made the decisions that they made, and the way some circumstances required them to carry out certain acts. We truly do not know and we won't know for awhile. If the prosecution does occur (if Dennett is elected) it would not be until Bush leaves office in January.
Post a Comment |
(0) Comments |
Permanent Link | Go Back
Comments
There are no comments for this post.
| About | Contact & Suggestions | Advertise | Partner | Press Room | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Sitemap |
| © Copyright 2008 Lawline, CLE Inc. All Rights Reserved. |